|
Home > Archive > Oracle Server > August 2005 > Omletv6 is released
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Omletv6 is released
|
|
|
|
| fitzjarrell@cox.net 2005-08-27, 8:23 pm |
|
Omletv6 wrote:
> Dear DBA,
>
> You are cordially invited to test and review our 100%
> pure Java Oracle 10g Monitoring Applet (OMLET).
<rest of spam snipped>
This presumes two facts not in evidence:
1) Anyone in this newsgroup cares about your product after your
previous performance which has been recorded for posterity in the
archives.
2) Someone can actually download the product from the links provided,
as the first link does not work (a message stating the evaluation
period for Omlet 4.0 has expired and, thus, no download is provided)
and the remaining links all reference Omlet 4.0, not 6.0 as
'advertised'.
Of course, since your product didn't work at release 4.0 it isn't
surprising your links don't work, either. One would think that by now,
had you any intelligence, both issues would have been corrected. We'll
never know, since Omlet 6.0 is not available for download as promised.
David Fitzjarrell
| |
| DA Morgan 2005-08-27, 8:23 pm |
| fitzjarrell@cox.net wrote:
> Omletv6 wrote:
>
>
>
> <rest of spam snipped>
>
> This presumes two facts not in evidence:
Ignore the troll. Send abuse complaints to geocities and
get him knocked off the air ... yet again.
--
Daniel A. Morgan
http://www.psoug.org
damorgan@x.washington.edu
(replace x with u to respond)
| |
| hpuxrac 2005-08-28, 9:23 am |
| fitzjarrell@cox.net wrote:
> Omletv6 wrote:
>
> 2) Someone can actually download the product from the links provided,
> as the first link does not work (a message stating the evaluation
> period for Omlet 4.0 has expired and, thus, no download is provided)
> and the remaining links all reference Omlet 4.0, not 6.0 as
> 'advertised'.
Mr. Fitzjarrel if you wish the author to fix the links perhaps a nicer
message would be appropriate.
Probably this posting as well as responses should go to the marketplace
not cdos.
| |
| fitzjarrell@cox.net 2005-08-28, 11:23 am |
| Comments embedded.
hpuxrac wrote:
> fitzjarrell@cox.net wrote:
>
> Mr. Fitzjarrel if you wish the author to fix the links perhaps a nicer
> message would be appropriate.
>
Were you to take the time and follow the history of Omlet you'd
discover I don't care if he fixes his links or not. His arrogance and
extremely rude behaviour in this newsgroup, coupled with his spurious
spam using any account name he wishes (see some recent posts by
'damorgan@damorgan.org', 'Janet Burleson', 'DonBurlesonIsASackO
fManur'
as well as posts by omlet, omletv4 and now omletv6 as well as any post
from teraknowledgesystems
.com) have made him unwelcome here.
> Probably this posting as well as responses should go to the marketplace
> not cdos.
We have already told him this, on numerous occasions, which you would
also have discovered had you investigated the history of Omlet. I
suggest you search the archives for any and all Omlet posts and finally
realise what a blight to this newsgroup he has become.
David Fitzjarrell
| |
| hpuxrac 2005-08-28, 11:23 am |
| fitzjarrell@cox.net wrote:
> Comments embedded.
> hpuxrac wrote:
>
> Were you to take the time and follow the history of Omlet you'd
> discover I don't care if he fixes his links or not. His arrogance and
> extremely rude behaviour in this newsgroup, coupled with his spurious
> spam using any account name he wishes (see some recent posts by
> 'damorgan@damorgan.org', 'Janet Burleson', 'DonBurlesonIsASackO
fManur'
> as well as posts by omlet, omletv4 and now omletv6 as well as any post
> from teraknowledgesystems
.com) have made him unwelcome here.
>
>
> We have already told him this, on numerous occasions, which you would
> also have discovered had you investigated the history of Omlet. I
> suggest you search the archives for any and all Omlet posts and finally
> realise what a blight to this newsgroup he has become.
>
>
> David Fitzjarrell
OK then why did you feel the need to repeat the posting and ask for
corrected links if you did not really want them?
If I understand then you are just repeating things that you don't want
in the first place.
I guess I don't understand what the purpose of your post was if there
was a purpose.
| |
| fitzjarrell@cox.net 2005-08-28, 11:23 am |
|
hpuxrac wrote:
> fitzjarrell@cox.net wrote:
>
> OK then why did you feel the need to repeat the posting and ask for
> corrected links if you did not really want them?
>
With what text did I request corrected links? I see no such desire in
my original post; why do you think that I did?
> If I understand then you are just repeating things that you don't want
> in the first place.
>
I'm asking for nothing, nor am I repeating things I don't want. You
clearly do not understand Amjad Daoud, his arrogant attitude or his
feigned superiority. Nor, apparently, do you grasp editorial comment.
> I guess I don't understand what the purpose of your post was if there
> was a purpose.
Apparently you don't. Again, had you searched the archives for Omlet
you'd have found answers to these questions of yours some time ago.
David Fitzjarrell
| |
| Joel Garry 2005-08-29, 8:23 pm |
| Probably should send complaints to supernews.com, yahoo,
info@mediaglitch.com and the domain here (for those too lazy to look up
the person in question, too):
http://www.talkaboutdatabases.com/g...ubmit=Search%21
Look at the headers:
Path:
g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!sn-xit-03!sn-xit-10!sn-xit-08!sn-xit-01!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail
From: "Omletv6" <teraknowledgesyste...@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server
Subject: Omletv6 is released
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 14:19:49 -0400
Organization: www.talkaboutdatabases.com
Message-ID:
< 89798a75f59787f0765e
81442cacc21d@localho
st.talkaboutdatabases.com>
X-Newsreader: www.talkaboutdatabases.com
X-Problems-To: info at talkaboutnetwork.com
X-Posted-By: USERID-70923
Content-Type: text/plain;
X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com
jg
--
@home.com is bogus.
Then again, maybe it's just someone updating a "Web Stalkers
Protect yourself from Internet Criminals & Psychopaths" book.
|
|
|
|
|