| Mike Epprecht \(SQL MVP\) 2005-09-22, 11:24 am |
| Hi
Have a look at the last post on this
http://groups.google.com.au/group/m...231ea9
f2
http://groups.google.com.au/group/m...7ef15c
da
http://groups.google.com.au/group/m...71bc80
08
Regards
--
--------------------------------
Mike Epprecht, Microsoft SQL Server MVP
Zurich, Switzerland
IM: mike@epprecht.net
MVP Program: http://www.microsoft.com/mvp
Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/epprecht/
"Carlos Eduardo Selonke de Souza"
< CarlosEduardoSelonke
deSouza@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:529DAF39-A3E6-4451-AE79- B91695CDFE7F@microso
ft.com...
> Hello
>
> I was doing some research about Windows 2003 Cluster with Majority Node
> Set
> and SQL Server 2000 EE support.
> I found some messages on the newsgroup saying that SQL Server 2000 is not
> supported on MNS cluster.
> I also read on SQL Server 2000 High Availability book on page 158 that SQL
> Server support both cluster types (MNS and Shared Storage).
> I also did not find any official documentation on the Microsoft web site
> staying that SQL Server 2000 clustering is not supported on a MSCS
> configured
> with MNS.
>
> Because of that I am a lit bit confused.
>
> Anyone know any document com Microsoft where its possible to read that SQL
> Server 2000 is not supported on an MNS cluster?
> I belive that is not possible to install SQL Server 2000 virtual server on
> a
> MNS quorum because the SQL Server needs a shared storage for the system
> and
> user databases. But It would be possible to install the WIndows 20003
> cluster
> on a MNS and them install SQL Server 2000 virtual server on a shared
> storage
> (SAN)?
>
> Regards
> --
> Carlos Eduardo Selonke de Souza
> http://carlos.geekbunker.org
|