Home > Archive > MS SQL Server Replication > July 2005 > pinning ms_replcommands (dbcc pintable)









You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

 

Author pinning ms_replcommands (dbcc pintable)
combfilter

2005-07-19, 8:24 pm

Is this a good performance increase suggestion if disk I/O seems to be
an issue sometimes.

We are replicating some very busy tables across a wan. We have ram to
spare on our distributor. We thought about pinning the ms_replcommands
table to see if we could help disk i/o .

is this a good idea?

tia
-comb
seanbell68@gmail.com

2005-07-19, 8:24 pm

I doubt you would get any performance increase. Pinning the table would
allow it to stay in memory but fetching rows from ms_replcommands is
not likely to be the source of the I/O. Also, if you have enough memory
SQL Server does a good job of managing what data needs to be cached.
More memory in the server might be a better solution.

combfilter

2005-07-19, 8:24 pm

In article <1121808111.871451.41790@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
seanbell68@gmail.com says...
> I doubt you would get any performance increase. Pinning the table would
> allow it to stay in memory but fetching rows from ms_replcommands is
> not likely to be the source of the I/O. Also, if you have enough memory
> SQL Server does a good job of managing what data needs to be cached.
> More memory in the server might be a better solution.
>
>

Thanks for the response. I hope a few more people throw in their two
cents on this. I need to present this back to them.

thx
-comb
Hilary Cotter

2005-07-20, 3:23 am

This is seldom a good idea.

--
Hilary Cotter
Looking for a SQL Server replication book?
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html

Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS
http://www.indexserverfaq.com
"combfilter" <asdf@adsf.com> wrote in message
news:MPG. 1d47340be37d3d7a9896
ab@news.newsreader.com...
> In article <1121808111.871451.41790@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
> seanbell68@gmail.com says...
> Thanks for the response. I hope a few more people throw in their two
> cents on this. I need to present this back to them.
>
> thx
> -comb



combfilter

2005-07-20, 11:23 am

In article <O1XvyTNjFHA.1480@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl>,
hilary.cotter@gmail.com says...
> This is seldom a good idea.
>
>

how come?
Sponsored Links





Also available: Server administration forum archive | Web Design forum archive | Software forum archive | Hardware reviews archive | Programming forum archive

Copyright 2008 droptable.com