|
Home > Archive > MS SQL XML > October 2006 > Fix
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
|
|
| AHilton 2006-10-28, 7:30 pm |
| The error message stated was wrong, the correct one was:
"The server returned an invalid or unrecognized response"
We identified that posts from .net v2 were working and posts from classic
ASP and client side javascript failed with the error above. We use XML v3 in
javascript and classic ASP.
By converting the XML to be posted to XML DOM v4 and posting using
xmlHttp/serverXmlHttp v4, the problem went away. (At this point it's too
difficult to convert the rest of the app to XML DOM v4)
Andrew
| |
| Umut Alev 2006-10-31, 7:18 pm |
| I assume you are using MSXML3 and Msxml2.XMLHTTP progid for posting your
updategrams.
Could you tell us what is the version of MSXML3?
Msxml3 version number is something like: 8.70.1113.0
Regards,
- Umut Alev
"AHilton" wrote:
> The error message stated was wrong, the correct one was:
>
> "The server returned an invalid or unrecognized response"
>
> We identified that posts from .net v2 were working and posts from classic
> ASP and client side javascript failed with the error above. We use XML v3 in
> javascript and classic ASP.
>
> By converting the XML to be posted to XML DOM v4 and posting using
> xmlHttp/serverXmlHttp v4, the problem went away. (At this point it's too
> difficult to convert the rest of the app to XML DOM v4)
>
> Andrew
| |
| AHilton 2006-10-31, 7:18 pm |
| Umut,
Yes, we were using MSXML3 via the progid 'Msxml2.XMLHTTP', which was changed
to ''Msxml2.XMLHTTP.4.0' in the fix.
The version number of MSXML3 that I have here is: 8.70.1113.0
Regards,
Andrew
"Umut Alev" wrote:
[color=darkred]
> I assume you are using MSXML3 and Msxml2.XMLHTTP progid for posting your
> updategrams.
> Could you tell us what is the version of MSXML3?
>
> Msxml3 version number is something like: 8.70.1113.0
>
> Regards,
> - Umut Alev
>
> "AHilton" wrote:
>
|
|
|
|
|