Home > Archive > PostgeSQL ODBC > November 2005 > "ANSI" misnomer (Re: Snapshot 08.01.0006 available for testing)









You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

 

Author "ANSI" misnomer (Re: Snapshot 08.01.0006 available for testing)
Marc Herbert

2005-11-08, 9:24 am

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:

> Dave Page wrote:
>
> Out of curiosity, why would it be called "ANSI"? Is this particular
> version standardized by ANSI? :)


<http://blogs.msdn.com/oldnewthing/a.../31/144893.aspx>

<http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/d...rog6_topic1.asp>

"The term "ANSI" as used to signify Windows code pages is a
historical reference, but is nowadays a misnomer that continues to
persist in the Windows community."

And "unicode" actually means UCS-2 or UTF-16 (depending on the platform).


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

Sponsored Links





Also available: Server administration forum archive | Web Design forum archive | Software forum archive | Hardware reviews archive | Programming forum archive

Copyright 2008 droptable.com