Home > Archive > PostgeSQL ODBC > February 2006 > Production version of ODBC drivers









You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

 

Author Production version of ODBC drivers
Mark Morgan Lloyd

2006-02-20, 7:23 am

Is there a URL showing which Win-32 ODBC binary is considered sufficiently
stable for production use?

--
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk

[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Peter Eisentraut

2006-02-20, 7:23 am

Am Montag, 20. Februar 2006 11:59 schrieb Mark Morgan Lloyd:
> Is there a URL showing which Win-32 ODBC binary is considered sufficiently
> stable for production use?


The latest one on the FTP server is the recommended one.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Mark Morgan Lloyd

2006-02-20, 9:23 am

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> Am Montag, 20. Februar 2006 11:59 schrieb Mark Morgan Lloyd:
>
> The latest one on the FTP server is the recommended one.


Yes, but /which/ FTP server and /where/? The last one I pulled was (I think)
when Hiroshi was still in charge, and since then as I understand it it's passed
through at least one set of hands- plus recent discussion I see here which
suggests that the project has forked into ODBC vs ODBCng.

--
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk

[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql
.org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Peter Eisentraut

2006-02-20, 9:23 am

Am Montag, 20. Februar 2006 15:59 schrieb Mark Morgan Lloyd:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> Yes, but /which/ FTP server and /where/?


ftp://ftp.postgresql.org/pub/odbc/

Anything else is a counterrevolutionary
conspiracy.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

Joshua D. Drake

2006-02-20, 1:23 pm

Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
>
> Yes, but /which/ FTP server and /where/? The last one I pulled was (I think)
> when Hiroshi was still in charge, and since then as I understand it it's passed
> through at least one set of hands- plus recent discussion I see here which
> suggests that the project has forked into ODBC vs ODBCng.
>

No. There is no fork. There are two FOSS open source drivers:

1. ODBC which can be had from any of the PostgreSQL mirrors
2. ODBCng which is a brand new (not finished yet) driver for PostgreSQL.

ODBCng can be found here:

http://projects.commandprompt.com/p...s/public/odbcng

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake




--
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: PLphp, PLperl - http://www.commandprompt.com/


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Sponsored Links





Also available: Server administration forum archive | Web Design forum archive | Software forum archive | Hardware reviews archive | Programming forum archive

Copyright 2008 droptable.com