Home > Archive > PostgreSQL Administration > October 2006 > Re: postgres in HA constellation









You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

 

Author Re: postgres in HA constellation
Brad Nicholson

2006-10-25, 8:24 am

On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 04:24 +0000, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to> wrote:
> the
> a
> that sounds great, that I can just start the slave, and it will repair
> whatever broke. I am aware of that I have to make sure that the master is
> really dead.


Be absolutely sure that you test, test, test this. And then test it
some more. There are all sorts of nasty surprises that can happen in an
HA config that can leave you with a corrupt database. As mentioned, two
postmasters writing on the same directory is certainly one.

But you have to watch for problems in the HA config can as well.

What happens if the load on the master shoots up to the point where it
can't release the disk resources in time? Will the other box try and
take over an scribble on your file system?

What happens when you pull the plug on the master while under load
(either physically, or virtually with a halt -q)?

How does the HA solution play with your file system of choice?

Trust me, you want to know the answers to all of these questions and
more before you even consider turning an HA solution on in your
production environment. Don't just rely on the marketing material and
what sales drones tell you. If not, make sure you have good backups.


Brad.


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Sponsored Links





Also available: Server administration forum archive | Web Design forum archive | Software forum archive | Hardware reviews archive | Programming forum archive

Copyright 2008 droptable.com