| Bruce Momjian 2005-12-22, 8:25 pm |
|
OK, I have applied the attached patch to HEAD and 8.1.X to mention the
storage system used by intervals. We don't deal with leap seconds. We
have no way to determine them in a portable way.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Karl O. Pinc wrote:
>
> On 12/21/2005 09:57:47 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
>
>
> That makes sense but could use some explaination somewhere,
> all units >= day will not "simplify". I guess it's obvious
> for months, and even years, but I aways forget about leap
> seconds. Remembering that there's a distinction between
> 1 day and 24 hours, does not come naturally.
>
> This definately could use explaination. There are certain
> "boundries" that interval operations do not "reduce"
> across.
> 24 hours != 1 day
> 365 days != 1 year
> 400 years != 4 centuries
>
> Oh boy, now I've confused myself. Is there any pattern
> to leap seconds comperable to the 400 year leap year?
> If there is that throws other "boundry"s into the mix,
> but if not then that impilies that any unit bigger
> than a day cannot be "combined" and "simplified".
> I.e. 7 days != 1 week because the leap second can
> come at the end of the week. Help, my brain is full.
> (And what about months? Is "interval '1 month'"
> even equal to "interval '1 month'" or is this like
> NULL where the test is always false? I presume not
> but clearly the month is another one of those units
> that won't "combine" with any other unit.)
>
> Thing is, I need to know what the interval I write
> really means.
>
> Karl <kop@meme.com>
> Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
> -- Robert A. Heinlein
>
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
|