Home > Archive > PostgreSQL Hacks > October 2005 > SQL99 compat list









You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

 

Author SQL99 compat list
Christopher Kings-Lynne

2005-10-27, 8:13 am

Has the sql compatibiliy list been updated? eg. for BETWEEN SYMMETRIC?

Chris


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

Peter Eisentraut

2005-10-27, 8:13 am

Am Dienstag, 25. Oktober 2005 11:17 schrieb Christopher Kings- Lynne:
> Has the sql compatibiliy list been updated? eg. for BETWEEN SYMMETRIC?


http://developer.postgresql.org/cvs...ql_features.txt

All signs point to "Sort of not really".

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql
.org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Christopher Kings-Lynne

2005-10-27, 8:14 am

>>Has the sql compatibiliy list been updated? eg. for BETWEEN SYMMETRIC?
>
>
> http://developer.postgresql.org/cvs...ql_features.txt
>
> All signs point to "Sort of not really".


Someone more knowledgeable than me will have to update it I think.
These look like likely candidates:

Row and table constructors?
All the "basic array" support stuff?
Row types?
Basic roles
Extended roles
IN/OUT/INOUT params (dunno what they're called - or even if they're
standard)

Chris


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

http://archives.postgresql.org

Sponsored Links





Also available: Server administration forum archive | Web Design forum archive | Software forum archive | Hardware reviews archive | Programming forum archive

Copyright 2008 droptable.com