|
Home > Archive > PostgreSQL Hacks > October 2005 > Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance
|
|
| Magnus Hagander 2005-10-27, 8:14 am |
| > > > OK, running the latest patch. Observations:
> backends
>
> Yea. I can vouch for Magnus as well (he said so off list).
> I'd vote with my own servers anyways.
Yup, and I can also vouch fo rmyself ;-) Just didn't get around to it
until now.
Yes, I believe we should be fine with that patch, even though we're late
in beta. It's a huge win, so I htink it's worth the small extra risk it
is.
//Magnus
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
| |
| Tom Lane 2005-10-27, 8:14 am |
| "Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net> writes:
[color=darkred]
> Yup, and I can also vouch fo rmyself ;-) Just didn't get around to it
> until now.
> Yes, I believe we should be fine with that patch, even though we're late
> in beta. It's a huge win, so I htink it's worth the small extra risk it
> is.
OK, patch committed. Please recheck that CVS tip is OK.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql
.org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
|
|
|
|
|