|
Home > Archive > PostgreSQL Hacks > April 2005
Pages: [1] 2
| Posts(1) | April 30, 2005, 8:25 pm | pl/Python | | Posts(1) | April 30, 2005, 8:25 pm | OLAP and PG and deja-vu | | Posts(1) | April 30, 2005, 8:25 pm | Re: Output functions with multiple arguments considered | | Posts(4) | April 30, 2005, 8:25 pm | Output functions with multiple arguments considered harmful | | Posts(3) | April 30, 2005, 8:25 pm | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement | | Posts(1) | April 30, 2005, 9:25 am | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement | | Posts(1) | April 30, 2005, 7:25 am | Re: [proposal] protocol extension to support loadable stream | | Posts(3) | April 30, 2005, 3:26 am | Re: Increased company involvement | | Posts(9) | April 29, 2005, 8:26 pm | [proposal] protocol extension to support loadable stream filters | | Posts(4) | April 29, 2005, 1:26 pm | Re: [GENERAL] Returning a RECORD, not SETOF RECORD | | Posts(2) | April 29, 2005, 3:26 am | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Implement sharable row-level locks, and use them for foreign key | | Posts(1) | April 28, 2005, 8:25 pm | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement | | Posts(1) | April 28, 2005, 11:24 am | Re: [JDBC] Statement Timeout and Locking | | Posts(1) | April 28, 2005, 7:24 am | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement | | Posts(1) | April 28, 2005, 3:25 am | Re: Increased company involvement | | Posts(10) | April 28, 2005, 3:25 am | Tablepartitioning: Will it be supported in Future? | | Posts(23) | April 28, 2005, 3:25 am | DO INSTEAD and conditional rules | | Posts(3) | April 27, 2005, 8:25 pm | PITR bad restore possibility? | | Posts(3) | April 27, 2005, 8:25 pm | Developer Community | | Posts(1) | April 27, 2005, 8:25 pm | Re: [PATCHES] [WIP] shared locks | | Posts(4) | April 27, 2005, 8:25 pm | Behavior of shared/exclusive row locks | | Posts(1) | April 27, 2005, 1:24 pm | Re: [PATCHES] Continue transactions after errors in psql | | Posts(1) | April 27, 2005, 1:24 pm | Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? | | Posts(1) | April 27, 2005, 11:23 am | Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? | | Posts(1) | April 27, 2005, 9:23 am | PITR and postmaster.pid | | Posts(1) | April 27, 2005, 9:23 am | Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? | | Posts(1) | April 27, 2005, 9:23 am | populating a table via the COPY command using C code. | | Posts(1) | April 27, 2005, 9:23 am | Re: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes | | Posts(1) | April 27, 2005, 3:24 am | Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? | | Posts(3) | April 27, 2005, 3:24 am | Disable large objects GUC | | Posts(1) | April 27, 2005, 3:24 am | Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? | | Posts(2) | April 27, 2005, 3:24 am | Re: bitmapscan test, no success, bs is not faster | | Posts(2) | April 27, 2005, 3:24 am | Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? | | Posts(1) | April 26, 2005, 8:24 pm | Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? | | Posts(1) | April 26, 2005, 8:24 pm | Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? | | Posts(1) | April 26, 2005, 8:24 pm | Re: How to make lazy VACUUM of one table run in several | | Posts(3) | April 26, 2005, 8:24 pm | Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? | | Posts(1) | April 26, 2005, 11:25 am | Re: bitmapscan test, no success, bs is not faster | | Posts(1) | April 26, 2005, 11:25 am | Re: bitmapscan test, no success, bs is not faster | | Posts(1) | April 26, 2005, 11:25 am | Re: Continue transactions after errors in psql | | Posts(2) | April 26, 2005, 11:25 am | btree_gist regression tests failing in 8.0 branch? | | Posts(1) | April 26, 2005, 7:24 am | Re: bitmapscan test, no success, again | | Posts(5) | April 26, 2005, 3:25 am | simplify register_dirty_segment() | | Posts(8) | April 26, 2005, 3:25 am | Re: [PATCHES] Continue transactions after errors in psql | | Posts(2) | April 25, 2005, 8:25 pm | Re: [PATCHES] Continue transactions after errors in psql | | Posts(1) | April 25, 2005, 8:25 pm | Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? | | Posts(1) | April 25, 2005, 8:25 pm | Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? | | Posts(2) | April 25, 2005, 8:25 pm | Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? | | Posts(17) | April 25, 2005, 8:25 pm | Constant WAL replay | | Posts(1) | April 25, 2005, 11:23 am | Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? | | Posts(1) | April 25, 2005, 11:23 am | How to make lazy VACUUM of one table run in several transactions ? | | Posts(1) | April 25, 2005, 11:23 am | Re: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes | | Posts(1) | April 25, 2005, 7:25 am | Re: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes | | Posts(12) | April 25, 2005, 7:25 am | possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes only. | | Posts(1) | April 25, 2005, 7:25 am | Re: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes | | Posts(1) | April 25, 2005, 7:25 am | Re: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes | | Posts(1) | April 25, 2005, 7:25 am | How to make lazy VACUUM of one table run in several transactions ? | | Posts(3) | April 25, 2005, 3:24 am | Passwords in PSQL | | Posts(4) | April 25, 2005, 3:24 am | CVS regression test problem | | Posts(5) | April 25, 2005, 3:24 am | Old-style OR indexscan slated for destruction | | Posts(1) | April 25, 2005, 3:24 am | Re: idea for concurrent seqscans | | Posts(1) | April 24, 2005, 8:24 pm | Re: Postgres: pg_hba.conf, md5, pg_shadow, encrypted | | Posts(3) | April 24, 2005, 8:24 pm | Re: W[i/e]rd performance issue with 8.1cvs | | Posts(6) | April 24, 2005, 8:24 pm | Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? | | Posts(1) | April 24, 2005, 8:24 pm | Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 | | Posts(1) | April 24, 2005, 8:24 pm | Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 | | Posts(3) | April 24, 2005, 11:23 am | Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 | | Posts(1) | April 24, 2005, 9:23 am | Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 | | Posts(4) | April 24, 2005, 9:23 am | Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! | | Posts(1) | April 24, 2005, 7:25 am | I know I am behind | | Posts(1) | April 24, 2005, 7:25 am | Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 | | Posts(10) | April 24, 2005, 7:25 am | Wierd performance issue with 8.1cvs | | Posts(1) | April 24, 2005, 3:23 am | Re: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes | | Posts(2) | April 23, 2005, 8:23 pm | Re: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes | | Posts(55) | April 23, 2005, 9:23 am | Postgres: pg_hba.conf, md5, pg_shadow, encrypted passwords | | Posts(1) | April 23, 2005, 9:23 am | Re: Postgres: pg_hba.conf, md5, pg_shadow, encrypted | | Posts(1) | April 23, 2005, 3:24 am | Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler | | Posts(1) | April 23, 2005, 3:24 am | possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes only. | | Posts(1) | April 23, 2005, 3:24 am | Re: Postgres: pg_hba.conf, md5, pg_shadow, encrypted | | Posts(3) | April 22, 2005, 8:24 pm | slides on the optimizer | | Posts(17) | April 22, 2005, 8:24 pm | Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! :) | | Posts(1) | April 22, 2005, 8:24 pm | Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! | | Posts(1) | April 22, 2005, 8:24 pm | Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! | | Posts(1) | April 22, 2005, 8:24 pm | Re: TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes only. | | Posts(2) | April 22, 2005, 1:23 pm | Re: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes | | Posts(1) | April 22, 2005, 1:23 pm | Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! | | Posts(12) | April 22, 2005, 1:23 pm | Proposal for background vacuum full/cluster | | Posts(1) | April 22, 2005, 1:23 pm | Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! | | Posts(1) | April 22, 2005, 1:23 pm | Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! | | Posts(3) | April 22, 2005, 11:23 am | Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! | | Posts(1) | April 22, 2005, 11:23 am | Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! | | Posts(3) | April 22, 2005, 9:24 am | PQfmod and varchars | | Posts(62) | April 21, 2005, 8:24 pm | Problem with PITR recovery | | Posts(1) | April 21, 2005, 11:24 am | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Install some slightly realistic cost | | Posts(1) | April 21, 2005, 11:24 am | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Install some slightly realistic cost | | Posts(4) | April 21, 2005, 11:24 am | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Install some slightly realistic cost estimation | | Posts(1) | April 21, 2005, 11:24 am | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Install some slightly realistic cost estimation | | Posts(1) | April 21, 2005, 9:24 am | Re: Postgres: pg_hba.conf, md5, pg_shadow, encrypted | | Posts(1) | April 21, 2005, 9:24 am | Re: Postgres: pg_hba.conf, md5, pg_shadow, encrypted | | Posts(1) | April 21, 2005, 9:23 am | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Install some slightly realistic cost | | Posts(9) | April 21, 2005, 9:23 am | WAL/PITR additional items | | Posts(1) | April 21, 2005, 9:23 am | Re: Postgres: pg_hba.conf, md5, pg_shadow, encrypted | | Posts(2) | April 21, 2005, 3:24 am | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Install some slightly realistic cost estimation | | Posts(5) | April 21, 2005, 3:24 am | Weirdess when altering serial column type | | Posts(4) | April 21, 2005, 3:24 am | Re: [GENERAL] Idea for the statistics collector | | Posts(2) | April 20, 2005, 8:24 pm | Re: Postgres: pg_hba.conf, md5, pg_shadow, encrypted passwords | | Posts(3) | April 20, 2005, 11:24 am | Win32 presentation | | Posts(3) | April 20, 2005, 11:24 am | HAVING <alias> ... | | Posts(4) | April 20, 2005, 11:24 am | Foreign keys on array elements | | Posts(19) | April 20, 2005, 9:24 am | argtype_inherit() is dead code | | Posts(4) | April 20, 2005, 7:23 am | Re: [GENERAL] Idea for the statistics collector | | Posts(2) | April 20, 2005, 3:24 am | ORDER BY different locales for 8.0 | | Posts(3) | April 19, 2005, 8:24 pm | Comparing Datum's at aminsert() stage | | Posts(4) | April 19, 2005, 11:23 am | SETOF function call | | Posts(3) | April 19, 2005, 3:24 am | Call to build-in operator from new operator | | Posts(2) | April 18, 2005, 8:24 pm | pg_hba.conf | | Posts(9) | April 18, 2005, 1:24 pm | Assigning fixed OIDs to system catalogs and indexes | | Posts(2) | April 18, 2005, 1:24 pm | SortMem... | | Posts(3) | April 18, 2005, 11:24 am | Call to build-in operator from new operator | | Posts(2) | April 18, 2005, 11:24 am | How to get triggeroid by triggername in postgres 8.0 | | Posts(2) | April 18, 2005, 11:24 am | Adding column in pg_proc | | Posts(3) | April 18, 2005, 9:24 am | Urgent | | Posts(2) | April 18, 2005, 9:24 am | Urgent | | Posts(2) | April 18, 2005, 7:24 am | Urgent | | Posts(2) | April 18, 2005, 7:23 am | How to get trigger oid by trigger name | | Posts(2) | April 18, 2005, 3:23 am | Urgent | | Posts(7) | April 16, 2005, 8:23 pm | Hash vs. HashJoin nodes | | Posts(1) | April 15, 2005, 8:24 pm | Praise (was: [ADMIN] is postgresql 8 is realy mature) | | Posts(2) | April 15, 2005, 8:24 pm | Help - Urgent | | Posts(5) | April 15, 2005, 1:23 pm | Kerberos patch in the queue | | Posts(3) | April 15, 2005, 1:23 pm | Why not cache stable functions? | | Posts(2) | April 15, 2005, 11:24 am | Re: Constant time insertion into highly non-unique | | Posts(16) | April 15, 2005, 11:24 am | Interactive docs idea | | Posts(1) | April 15, 2005, 7:24 am | Re: pgsql: Done > * -Use indexes for MIN() and MAX() | | Posts(3) | April 15, 2005, 3:24 am | Help - Urgent | | Posts(13) | April 15, 2005, 3:24 am | OUT parameters in PL/Java | | Posts(1) | April 14, 2005, 8:24 pm | Multicolumn hash tables space complexity. | | Posts(5) | April 14, 2005, 1:24 pm | Constant time insertion into highly non-unique indexes | | Posts(1) | April 14, 2005, 11:27 am | Re: Constant time insertion into highly non-unique | | Posts(1) | April 14, 2005, 11:27 am | Re: Constant time insertion into highly non-unique | | Posts(4) | April 14, 2005, 3:24 am | Regression failures on freebsd | | Posts(3) | April 13, 2005, 8:24 pm | PLM pulling from CVS nightly for testing in STP | | Posts(14) | April 13, 2005, 8:24 pm | System vs non-system casts | | Posts(4) | April 13, 2005, 1:24 pm | Test coverage for external sorting | | Posts(6) | April 13, 2005, 3:24 am | ISO-8859-1 encoding not enforced? | | Posts(2) | April 12, 2005, 8:24 pm | recovery from idiot delete error | | Posts(1) | April 12, 2005, 8:24 pm | Simplifying bootstrap OID assignment | | Posts(6) | April 12, 2005, 11:25 am | HEAD version of initdb fails on Win32 | | Posts(20) | April 11, 2005, 8:25 pm | prepared statements don't log arguments? | | Posts(2) | April 11, 2005, 8:25 pm | Re: [PATCHES] DELETE ... USING | | Posts(1) | April 11, 2005, 8:25 pm | Re: NetBSD mac68k crashing on union regression test | | Posts(1) | April 11, 2005, 8:25 pm | Re: Need help woth thread support in ecpglib | | Posts(3) | April 11, 2005, 8:25 pm | probably needless linking against readline and ncurses | | Posts(5) | April 11, 2005, 8:25 pm | Question regarding clock-sweep | | Posts(2) | April 11, 2005, 9:23 am | Recursive types? | | Posts(12) | April 11, 2005, 7:25 am | Unicode problems on IRC | | Posts(3) | April 11, 2005, 7:25 am | Case Sensitivity | | Posts(1) | April 10, 2005, 8:24 pm | Re: [PERFORM] Functionscan estimates | | Posts(2) | April 10, 2005, 8:24 pm | Tab-completion feature ? | | Posts(4) | April 10, 2005, 8:24 pm | Three-byte Unicode characters | | Posts(1) | April 9, 2005, 8:26 pm | Re: [GENERAL] table and column information from cursor? | | Posts(15) | April 9, 2005, 8:26 pm | Optimizing maximum/minimum queries (yet again) | | Posts(2) | April 9, 2005, 8:26 pm | Re: [PATCHES] DELETE ... USING | | Posts(1) | April 9, 2005, 8:26 pm | Re: [PATCHES] DELETE ... USING | | Posts(6) | April 9, 2005, 10:09 am | Re: Optimizing maximum/minimum queries (yet again) | | Posts(2) | April 9, 2005, 10:09 am | Re: [PATCHES] DELETE ... USING | | Posts(2) | April 9, 2005, 10:09 am | Re: Optimizing maximum/minimum queries (yet again) | | Posts(1) | April 9, 2005, 10:09 am | Re: [PATCHES] DELETE ... USING | | Posts(1) | April 9, 2005, 10:09 am | Re: Optimizing maximum/minimum queries (yet again) | | Posts(1) | April 9, 2005, 10:09 am | Re: Optimizing maximum/minimum queries (yet again) | | Posts(2) | April 9, 2005, 10:09 am | Re: Optimizing maximum/minimum queries (yet again) | | Posts(5) | April 8, 2005, 7:02 am | Call for objections: merge Resdom with TargetEntry | | Posts(4) | April 8, 2005, 7:02 am | Weird psql crash | | Posts(2) | April 8, 2005, 7:02 am | 8.0.2 bundled ... | | Posts(10) | April 7, 2005, 8:03 pm | add_missing_from in 8.1 | | Posts(2) | April 7, 2005, 8:03 pm | 'now' runtime | | Posts(2) | April 7, 2005, 8:03 pm | About index_build | | Posts(1) | April 7, 2005, 8:03 pm | Re: Recognizing range constraints (was Re: Plan for relatively simple query seems to be very ineffi | | Posts(1) | April 7, 2005, 8:03 pm | Re: Recognizing range constraints (was Re: Plan for relatively simple query seems to be very ineffi | | Posts(3) | April 7, 2005, 7:03 am | Shared row locking, revisited | | Posts(2) | April 7, 2005, 7:03 am | Did this issue ever get resolved? | | Posts(1) | April 6, 2005, 8:03 pm | Recognizing range constraints (was Re: [PERFORM] Plan for relatively simple query seems to be very | | Posts(1) | April 6, 2005, 8:03 pm | Re: Recognizing range constraints (was Re: [PERFORM] Plan for relatively simple query seems to be v | | Posts(1) | April 6, 2005, 8:03 pm | Re: Recognizing range constraints (was Re: [PERFORM] Plan for relatively simple query seems to be v | | Posts(1) | April 6, 2005, 8:03 pm | Re: Recognizing range constraints (was Re: [PERFORM] Plan for relatively simple query seems to be v | | Posts(1) | April 6, 2005, 8:03 pm | Re: Recognizing range constraints (was Re: [PERFORM] Plan for | | Posts(5) | April 6, 2005, 8:03 pm | 8.0.2 beta announcement?? | | Posts(1) | April 6, 2005, 8:03 pm | Another trip for me | | Posts(1) | April 6, 2005, 8:03 pm | Re: Two phase commit | | Posts(1) | April 6, 2005, 7:02 am | Free hidden Program to instantly hack any website! NEW PASSWORD didn't work before now it will! Onl | | Posts(7) | April 5, 2005, 8:06 pm | REINDEX ALL | | Posts(27) | April 5, 2005, 8:06 pm | Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core? | | Posts(9) | April 5, 2005, 8:06 pm | Should we still require RETURN in plpgsql? | | Posts(1) | April 5, 2005, 8:06 pm | Re: [GENERAL] Vacuum time degrading | | Posts(4) | April 5, 2005, 8:06 pm | Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core? | | Posts(3) | April 5, 2005, 7:02 am | Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core? | | Posts(3) | April 5, 2005, 7:02 am | PgFoundry.org busted? | | Posts(11) | April 5, 2005, 7:02 am | Notes on lock table spilling | | Posts(1) | April 5, 2005, 7:02 am | Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core? | | Posts(1) | April 4, 2005, 8:05 pm | Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core? |
|
|