|
Home > Archive > PostgreSQL Patches > August 2005 > bug in opclass "alter table owner" handling?
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
bug in opclass "alter table owner" handling?
|
|
| Alvaro Herrera 2005-08-22, 8:25 pm |
| Looks like a bug to me, at least -- opclasses are registered using the
opclass Oid, not the access method Oid, right?
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]alvh.no-ip.org> )
"The eagle never lost so much time, as
when he submitted to learn of the crow." (William Blake)
| |
| Tom Lane 2005-08-23, 3:24 am |
| Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
> Looks like a bug to me, at least -- opclasses are registered using the
> opclass Oid, not the access method Oid, right?
Yup, definitely wrong. Patch applied --- thanks!
[ digs around ... ] The other calls of changeDependencyOnOw
ner seem
OK; I guess this one was just a thinko.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
|
|
|
|
|