Home > Archive > PostgreSQL Performance > March 2006 > Re: Migration study, step 1: bulk write performance









You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

 

Author Re: Migration study, step 1: bulk write performance
Csaba Nagy

2006-03-21, 7:28 am

> For the record, that's the wrong way round. For the data partitioning
> metadata journaling is enough, and for the WAL partition you don't need any
> FS journaling at all.


Yes, you're right: the data partition shouldn't loose file creation,
deletion, etc., which is not important for the WAL partition where the
WAL files are mostly recycled... right ?

Cheers,
Csaba.



---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Sponsored Links





Also available: Server administration forum archive | Web Design forum archive | Software forum archive | Hardware reviews archive | Programming forum archive

Copyright 2008 droptable.com