| Bruce Momjian 2005-11-25, 8:24 pm |
| John R Pierce wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> I think its quite reasonable for the one line description of a postgres
> bug to reference "CVE-2005-0247 multiple buffer overflows..." or
> whatever, I guess it kind of depends on which came first... if the CVE
> security item came first, and was entered into the PGSQL bug tracker,
> then this makes a LOT of sense. if the CVE folks create their entry
> AFTER the bug has been entered into PGSQL, it makes less sense.
We don't have a bug tracker, see the current FAQ.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
match
|