|
Home > Archive > PostgreSQL Bugs > December 2005 > BUG #2117: inconsistency in sum
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
BUG #2117: inconsistency in sum
|
|
| Adam Kolany 2005-12-15, 1:24 pm |
|
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 2117
Logged by: Adam Kolany
Email address: dr.a.kolany@wp.pl
PostgreSQL version: 8.0.1
Operating system: Linux, SuSe 9.2
Description: inconsistency in sum
Details:
can you explain this?
====================
====================
==============
stoff=> select sum(wplyw),sum(wydat
ek), sum(wplyw)-sum(wydatek) from
rachunki where okres<6;
sum | sum | ?column?
-------+---------+----------
73745 | 6712.55 | 67032.5
(1 row)
stoff=>
====================
====================
==============
in real, the 'sum(wplyw)' should be: 73745,05
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql
.org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
| |
| Michael Fuhr 2005-12-15, 1:24 pm |
| On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 11:03:55AM +0000, Adam Kolany wrote:
> can you explain this?
> ====================
====================
==============
> stoff=> select sum(wplyw),sum(wydat
ek), sum(wplyw)-sum(wydatek) from
> rachunki where okres<6;
> sum | sum | ?column?
> -------+---------+----------
> 73745 | 6712.55 | 67032.5
> (1 row)
What data types are wplyw and wydatek?
--
Michael Fuhr
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
| |
| Tom Lane 2005-12-15, 1:24 pm |
| "Adam Kolany" <dr.a.kolany@wp.pl> writes:
> can you explain this?
> ====================
====================
==============
> stoff=> select sum(wplyw),sum(wydat
ek), sum(wplyw)-sum(wydatek) from
> rachunki where okres<6;
> sum | sum | ?column?
> -------+---------+----------
> 73745 | 6712.55 | 67032.5
> (1 row)
Seems odd, but you haven't provided nearly enough information to let
anyone else reproduce the problem.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
| |
| Michael Fuhr 2005-12-15, 8:25 pm |
| [Please copy the mailing list on replies.]
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 07:32:54PM +0100, Adam Kolany wrote:
> Michael Fuhr napisa?(a):
> they were float(2)
>
> casting them into numeric helped, so I have changed the types of the to
> numeric, instead of float(2)
>
> this is however a bug, I think.
float(2) gives you a real, aka float4 (32-bit floating point). As
the documentation points out, that type has a precision of 6 decimal
digits; you seem to object to the rounding:
test=> SELECT 73745::float8 - 6712.55::float8;
?column?
----------
67032.45
(1 row)
test=> SELECT 67032.45::float4;
float4
---------
67032.5
(1 row)
test=> SELECT 73745::float4 - 6712.55::float4;
?column?
----------
67032.5
(1 row)
That's arguably not a bug: you've requested a low-precision data
type so you have to expect discrepancies around that 6th digit of
precision. If you need greater precision then use a double precision
(float8) type, or if you need exact precision (e.g., for handling
money) then use numeric.
--
Michael Fuhr
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
|
|
|
|
|