| Author |
Steps for migrar codewarrior 5.0 with sybase 7.0.4 to codewarrior 8.0 with sybase 9.0.2
|
|
| Luis Ponce Ibarra - Hotmail 2005-07-20, 8:23 pm |
| I have an application in code warrior 5.0 with sybase anywhere 7.0.4 and I
want migrar to code warrior 8.0 with sybase anywhere 9.0.2. In the
application I have defined 30 pragma so that they estimate the size of the
application - it is big -.
The migrar purpose to codewarrior 8.0 are because the version in codewarrior
5 are not programming guided to objective and of what you/they have
mentioned me any superior version to codewarrior 8.0 I should return her to
make because alone it is programming guided to object.
They could help me indicating that steps should continue for migrar the
application where I can get some example or any information that I could
help and to guide in the migration.
| |
| David Fishburn 2005-07-27, 7:24 am |
| "Luis Ponce Ibarra - Hotmail" < luisponceibarra@hotm
ail.com> wrote in
news:42dee70c$1@foru
ms-2-dub of sybase.public.sqlanywhere.ultralite:
LPI-H> I have an application in code warrior 5.0 with sybase anywhere 7.0.4
LPI-H> and I want migrar to code warrior 8.0 with sybase anywhere 9.0.2. In
LPI-H> the application I have defined 30 pragma so that they estimate the
LPI-H> size of the application - it is big -.
LPI-H> The migrar purpose to codewarrior 8.0 are because the version in
LPI-H> codewarrior 5 are not programming guided to objective and of what
LPI-H> you/they have mentioned me any superior version to codewarrior 8.0 I
LPI-H> should return her to make because alone it is programming guided to
LPI-H> object. They could help me indicating that steps should continue for
LPI-H> migrar the application where I can get some example or any
information
LPI-H> that I could help and to guide in the migration.
Sorry, but I don't really understand what you are asking. Could you
rephrase?
--
David Fishburn
Certified ASA Developer Version 8
iAnywhere Solutions - Sybase
Professional Services
Please only post to the newsgroup
Please ALWAYS include version and MORE importantly BUILD number with
EACH post (dbeng9 -v).
EBFs and Maintenance Releases
http://downloads.sybase.com/swx/sdmain.stm
Developer Community / Whitepapers
http://www.ianywhere.com/developer
CaseXpress - to report bugs
http://casexpress.sybase.com
CodeXchange - Free samples
[url]http://ianywhere.codexchange.sybase.com/servlets/ ProjectDocumentList[
/url]
| |
| Luis Ponce Ibarra - Hotmail 2005-07-27, 8:23 pm |
| I want migrar my current application that I have it in sybase 7.0 with
codewarrior 5 to sybase 9 using codewarrior 8. As I can make it?
"David Fishburn" <fishburn_spam@off.ianywhere.com> escribió en el mensaje
news:Xns96A0557CB20D
Cfishburnsybasecom@1
27.0.0.1...
> "Luis Ponce Ibarra - Hotmail" < luisponceibarra@hotm
ail.com> wrote in
> news:42dee70c$1@foru
ms-2-dub of sybase.public.sqlanywhere.ultralite:
>
> LPI-H> I have an application in code warrior 5.0 with sybase anywhere
7.0.4
> LPI-H> and I want migrar to code warrior 8.0 with sybase anywhere 9.0.2.
In
> LPI-H> the application I have defined 30 pragma so that they estimate the
> LPI-H> size of the application - it is big -.
> LPI-H> The migrar purpose to codewarrior 8.0 are because the version in
> LPI-H> codewarrior 5 are not programming guided to objective and of what
> LPI-H> you/they have mentioned me any superior version to codewarrior 8.0
I
> LPI-H> should return her to make because alone it is programming guided to
> LPI-H> object. They could help me indicating that steps should continue
for
> LPI-H> migrar the application where I can get some example or any
> information
> LPI-H> that I could help and to guide in the migration.
>
> Sorry, but I don't really understand what you are asking. Could you
> rephrase?
>
> --
> David Fishburn
> Certified ASA Developer Version 8
> iAnywhere Solutions - Sybase
> Professional Services
> Please only post to the newsgroup
> Please ALWAYS include version and MORE importantly BUILD number with
> EACH post (dbeng9 -v).
>
> EBFs and Maintenance Releases
> http://downloads.sybase.com/swx/sdmain.stm
>
> Developer Community / Whitepapers
> http://www.ianywhere.com/developer
>
> CaseXpress - to report bugs
> http://casexpress.sybase.com
>
> CodeXchange - Free samples
> [url]http://ianywhere.codexchange.sybase.com/servlets/ ProjectDocumentList[
/url]
>
| |
| Luis Ponce Ibarra - Hotmail 2005-08-03, 8:23 pm |
| we want to use cw 8 because the original application this in cw 5 and we are
NOT using OOP and of what I have listened in cw 9 alone you can use OOP.
If some update way exists the cw5 application to cw9 without modifying the
structured programming that we manage - I refer to not applying OOP - they
can help me.
Not wanting to use OOP is due to that to change to not make the whole
project which are not able to at this time for time.
"Greg Fenton" <greg. fenton_NOSPAM_@ianyw
here.com> escribió en el mensaje
news:42e90beb$1@foru
ms-2-dub...
> Luis Ponce Ibarra - Hotmail wrote:
>
> Yes but there will be some changes you likely need to make, usually
> around the code segmentation configuration you used in CW5/UL7. In
> newer versions of UL, the code generated is much smarter about code
> segments and the work arounds people put in older code should be
> replaced with the newer techniques.
>
> As well, there are new features in 9.x that you might decide to use for
> either performance reasons or because some older features are depricated.
>
> greg.fenton
> --
> Greg Fenton
> Consultant, Solution Services, iAnywhere Solutions
> --------
> Visit the iAnywhere Solutions Developer Community
> Whitepapers, TechDocs, Downloads
> http://www.ianywhere.com/developer/
| |
| Tim McClements 2005-08-05, 8:23 pm |
| OOP - object oriented programming? I don't see why CW 8 vs 9 would be any
different in this respect. I've found CW 9 to be better, too.
- Tim
"Luis Ponce Ibarra - Hotmail" < luisponceibarra@hotm
ail.com> wrote in message
news:42f11ad9@forums
-2-dub...
> we want to use cw 8 because the original application this in cw 5 and we
> are
> NOT using OOP and of what I have listened in cw 9 alone you can use OOP.
> If some update way exists the cw5 application to cw9 without modifying the
> structured programming that we manage - I refer to not applying OOP - they
> can help me.
> Not wanting to use OOP is due to that to change to not make the whole
> project which are not able to at this time for time.
>
>
> "Greg Fenton" <greg. fenton_NOSPAM_@ianyw
here.com> escribió en el mensaje
> news:42e90beb$1@foru
ms-2-dub...
>
>
|
|
|
|