Home > Archive > Slony1 PostgreSQL Replication > June 2005 > Slony-I 1.1 Release Date









You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

 

Author Slony-I 1.1 Release Date
Niels Breet

2005-06-22, 9:24 am

Guys,

We have had no real bugs reported since the release of RC1. Gborg
has no big problems in the bugdatabase, as far as I can see. No big
changes were added to CVS that would need another RC?

What is keeping us from releasing 1.1? Can we plan a releasedate yet?


-Niels
Christopher Kings-Lynne

2005-06-22, 9:24 am

Any chance you guys could do two things to make life easier for
phpPgAdmin devs:

* Have clearly separate 1.0 and 1.1 documentation - at the moment it's
hard to see what's 1.1 and 1.0 features.

* Have a clearly defined statement as to what has changed, etc. so that
phpPgAdmin can easily support it?

Chris

Niels Breet wrote:
> Guys,
>
> We have had no real bugs reported since the release of RC1. Gborg
> has no big problems in the bugdatabase, as far as I can see. No big
> changes were added to CVS that would need another RC?
>
> What is keeping us from releasing 1.1? Can we plan a releasedate yet?
>
>
> -Niels
>
>
> ____________________
____________________
_______
> Slony1-general mailing list
> Slony1-general- AuKwsB3Fm+ugFIWk8tvy
RWD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org
> http://gborg.postgresql.org/mailman.../slony1-general

Christopher Browne

2005-06-22, 11:24 am

Niels Breet wrote:

>Guys,
>
>We have had no real bugs reported since the release of RC1. Gborg
>has no big problems in the bugdatabase, as far as I can see. No big
>changes were added to CVS that would need another RC?
>
>What is keeping us from releasing 1.1? Can we plan a releasedate yet?
>
>

Jan and I were in NYC Monday, which is why nothing too much happened
between Friday and now.

Based on what you saw (e.g. - no big problems outstanding), it seems
reasonable that the next release ought to be 1.1.0, and that this may
take place Real Soon Now(tm).

Hopefully there will be some form of "quorum" of interested developers
on IRC so a consensus can emerge...
Devrim GUNDUZ

2005-06-22, 11:24 am

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


Hi,

On Wed, 22 Jun 2005, Christopher Browne wrote:

> Based on what you saw (e.g. - no big problems outstanding), it seems
> reasonable that the next release ought to be 1.1.0, and that this may
> take place Real Soon Now(tm).


Also I think we should make a "Call for Supported Platforms" before
releasing 1.1.0 stable.

Regards,
- --
Devrim GUNDUZ
devrim~gunduz.org, devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.tdmsoft.com.tr http://www.gunduz.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCuYz5tl86P3SP
fQ4RAhOzAJ4kb5t+y37v
Zeamt7Tw2K0cbB0NXACg
oMAz
YvoKNh145xu5ZuNC1iBh
reA=
=CPtF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Sponsored Links





Also available: Server administration forum archive | Web Design forum archive | Software forum archive | Hardware reviews archive | Programming forum archive

Copyright 2008 droptable.com