| Author |
Call For Supported Platforms
|
|
| Christopher Browne 2005-06-22, 1:25 pm |
| We are very nearly ready to release Slony-I 1.1, and would like to
collect together a list of platforms where version 1.1 is known to work.
We do know already that it runs on a pretty goodly diverse set of OS
platforms; there are a few that we'd like to verify.
The loose list that we know about:
- AIX 5.1
- Solaris 9
- FreeBSD 5.x
- FreeBSD 4.9
- Linux:
RHES 3
Debian/sid
SuSE
- OpenBSD
We know that Slony-I 1.1 doesn't run on Windows(tm).
We know that people have been having difficulties running PostgreSQL on
AIX 5.3, so Slony-I correspondingly can't work there yet :-(
There have been no reports concerning HP/UX, and so we cannot be certain
of its status there.
If you have successfully run the "release candidate" of Slony-I. it
would be much appreciated if we could receive a listing formatted as
below...
For instance:
OS and Version: SuSE Enterprise 9
Hardware Architecture: AMD-64
PostgreSQL Version: 7.4.7
Status: OK
or
OS and Version: AIX 5.1
Hardware Architecture: PPC
PostgreSQL Version: 8.0.2
Status: OK
-- Snip Here --
OS and Version:
Hardware Architecture:
PostgreSQL Version:
Status:
-- Snip Here --
So as to not fill up the list with this, please reply to Christopher
Browne <cbbrowne-swQf4SbcV9C7WVzo/KQ3Mw@public.gmane.org>
| |
| Andreas Pflug 2005-06-22, 1:25 pm |
| Christopher Browne wrote:
>
> The loose list that we know about :
> - AIX 5.1
> - Solaris 9
> - FreeBSD 5.x
> - FreeBSD 4.9
> - Linux:
> RHES 3
> Debian/sid
> SuSE
> - OpenBSD
>
> We know that Slony-I 1.1 doesn't run on Windows(tm).
I think we'll have it done before autumn.
Regards,
Andreas
| |
| Dave Page 2005-06-22, 8:25 pm |
|
[The original message will be inserted by the server.]
-----Original Message-----
From: "Andreas Pflug"<pgadmin- fm2TWiLXNCrrZyGJdb+2
erNAH6kLmebB@public.gmane.org>
Sent: 22/06/05 19:52:18
To: "cbbrowne-swQf4SbcV9C7WVzo/KQ3Mw@public.gmane.org"<cbbrowne-swQf4SbcV9C7WVzo/KQ3Mw@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "Slony Mailing List"<slony1-general- AuKwsB3Fm+ugFIWk8tvy
RWD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [Slony1-general] Call For Supported Platforms
>
> I think we'll have it done before autumn.
Absolutely, but it won't be in 1.1.0!
Regards, Dave
-----Unmodified Original Message-----
Christopher Browne wrote:
>
> The loose list that we know about :
> - AIX 5.1
> - Solaris 9
> - FreeBSD 5.x
> - FreeBSD 4.9
> - Linux:
> RHES 3
> Debian/sid
> SuSE
> - OpenBSD
>
> We know that Slony-I 1.1 doesn't run on Windows(tm).
I think we'll have it done before autumn.
Regards,
Andreas
____________________
____________________
_______
Slony1-general mailing list
Slony1-general- AuKwsB3Fm+ugFIWk8tvy
RWD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org
http://gborg.postgresql.org/mailman.../slony1-general
| |
| Christopher Browne 2005-06-22, 8:25 pm |
| Andreas Pflug wrote:
> Christopher Browne wrote:
>
>
>
> I think we'll have it done before autumn.
That will mean that 1.2 runs on Windows(tm).
Version 1.1 won't...
| |
| Andreas Pflug 2005-06-22, 8:25 pm |
| Christopher Browne wrote:
> Andreas Pflug wrote:
>
>
>
>
> That will mean that 1.2 runs on Windows(tm).
>
> Version 1.1 won't...
I don't think that deeper structural changes are necessary in slony, so
1.1.1 seems realistic.
Regards,
Andreas
| |
| Devrim GUNDUZ 2005-06-22, 8:25 pm |
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On Wed, 22 Jun 2005, Christopher Browne wrote:
> We are very nearly ready to release Slony-I 1.1, and would like to
> collect together a list of platforms where version 1.1 is known to work.
<snip>
OS and Version: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Enterprise Server 3.0
Hardware Architecture: Intel x86
PostgreSQL Version: 8.0.3, 7.4.8
Status: OK
OS and Version: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Enterprise Server 4
Hardware Architecture: Intel x86
PostgreSQL Version: 8.0.3
Status: OK
OS and Version: Fedora Core 3
Hardware Architecture: Intel x86
PostgreSQL Version: 8.0.3, 7.4.8
Status: OK
OS and Version: Fedora Core 4
Hardware Architecture: Intel x86
PostgreSQL Version: 8.0.3, 7.4.8
Status: OK
Notes to all: Docs fail to build, NAMELEN value must be increased from 44
to 100...
Regards,
- --
Devrim GUNDUZ
devrim~gunduz.org, devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.tdmsoft.com.tr http://www.gunduz.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCueGbtl86P3SP
fQ4RAhedAJwNb7TN76KL
2cEY0D+reMb8Ic2jjQCf
T/At
2awDCamigP/eT61GTe9RaWw=
=Jljd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| |
|
|
| Jan Wieck 2005-06-23, 11:24 am |
| On 6/22/2005 6:05 PM, Andreas Pflug wrote:
> Christopher Browne wrote:
>
> I don't think that deeper structural changes are necessary in slony, so
> 1.1.1 seems realistic.
Do you happen to know something we don't? How will the posix threads
used in slon work under windows without structural changes?
Jan
--
#===================
====================
====================
===========#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#===================
====================
=========== JanWieck- bwPqjjyvM7QAvxtiuMwx
3w@public.gmane.org #
| |
| Hiroshi Saito 2005-06-23, 11:24 am |
| From: "Jan Wieck" <JanWieck- bwPqjjyvM7QAvxtiuMwx
3w@public.gmane.org>
>
> Do you happen to know something we don't? How will the posix threads
> used in slon work under windows without structural changes?
Um, As for it, a change in structure is necessary for the reality. It has some
points of common changes. They hope that it is advanced by the discussion.
Our plan works.:-)
http://cre-ent.skcapi.co.jp/~saito/....0-20050527.zip
Regards,
Hiroshi Saito
| |
| Andreas Pflug 2005-06-24, 11:25 am |
| Jan Wieck wrote:
> On 6/22/2005 6:05 PM, Andreas Pflug wrote:
>
>
>
> Do you happen to know something we don't? How will the posix threads
> used in slon work under windows without structural changes?
pthread is available for mingw, so I'm just optimistic.
regards,
Andreas
|
|
|
|