Home > Archive > MS Access data conversion > July 2005 > Support for Jet databse engine









You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

 

Author Support for Jet databse engine
Guyan

2005-07-12, 3:24 am

Hi there

I heard that Microsofy was dropping support for the Jet database engine. Is
this true ?
Allen Browne

2005-07-12, 3:24 am

Complete twaddle.

For ane example of what Microsoft is saying about the next version of
Access, see:
http://msaccessadvisor.com/doc/14978

Example statement:
Microsoft Access lead program manager Clint Covington says, "You'll find a
strategic commitment to radically upgrade the quality of Access applications
by improving the core forms and reports experience, using Jet as the query
processor."

--
Allen Browne - Microsoft MVP. Perth, Western Australia.
Tips for Access users - http://allenbrowne.com/tips.html
Reply to group, rather than allenbrowne at mvps dot org.

"Guyan" <Guyan@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:34114E21-3FAA-4107-90C5- 7D6FDD854CB2@microso
ft.com...
> Hi there
>
> I heard that Microsofy was dropping support for the Jet database engine.
> Is
> this true ?



Chris Mills

2005-07-12, 3:24 am

Here's a post I pre-wrote, but was much too scared to send without the support
of someone like Allen (who knows much more)
----------
Not that I've heard of. Though I've no idea what their new plans are, A2003
must be nearly due for replacement (on Microsoft's timescale)

Anyone else?

> Microsofy

I LOVE it!!!

"Guyan" <Guyan@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:34114E21-3FAA-4107-90C5- 7D6FDD854CB2@microso
ft.com...
> Hi there
>
> I heard that Microsofy was dropping support for the Jet database engine. Is
> this true ?




2005-07-19, 7:24 am


"Guyan" <Guyan@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:34114E21-3FAA-4107-90C5- 7D6FDD854CB2@microso
ft.com...
> Hi there
>
> I heard that Microsofy was dropping support for the Jet database engine.

Is
> this true ?


Jet was on the 'fixes only, no development' list.

It appears that MS may have changed their mind.

Microsoft Exchange has not completed it's move from a Jet-type
database to SQL Server. Also, there is no clarity about what is
happening to file-system indexing, search, and data retrieval. If
MS gives us Google-like ability to find and use data on our hard
drives, then a database engine which uses the database services
provided by the file system may make sense again.

(david)


Sponsored Links





Also available: Server administration forum archive | Web Design forum archive | Software forum archive | Hardware reviews archive | Programming forum archive

Copyright 2008 droptable.com