|
Home > Archive > MS Access Multiuser > May 2005 > Access 2000 on Termials Service 2003 Cluster
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Access 2000 on Termials Service 2003 Cluster
|
|
| Robert1105 2005-05-02, 8:25 pm |
| We are running a TS 2003 Cluster running into a Server 2003 infrastructure.
Our Access Database is Access 2000. There is a Tech Note regarding needing
to run the Terminal Services Transform on an Access 2000 database; however,
this relates to a Server 2000 environment. I am not able to find any
information on what should be done in a Server 2003 environment. I am
courious abour what you were able to get working? We have tried to implement
the recommendations in the Tech Note; however, when we click the Frontedn
icon, nothing happens. We are looking for some assistance in understanding
how to set-up this environment correctly. Your assistance is greatly
appreciated.
Sincerely,
Robert
| |
| Van T. Dinh 2005-05-05, 7:25 am |
| We are using an Access 2002 on Win 2003 Terminal Server with a number of
users still on Citrix MetaFrame on Win 2000 server. The whole system works
fine except for the mapping of printers by Citrix.
--
HTH
Van T. Dinh
MVP (Access)
"Robert1105" < Robert1105@discussio
ns.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:06B97D55-C1F2-47E3-93FF- 26FE5293EDAE@microso
ft.com...
> We are running a TS 2003 Cluster running into a Server 2003
infrastructure.
> Our Access Database is Access 2000. There is a Tech Note regarding
needing
> to run the Terminal Services Transform on an Access 2000 database;
however,
> this relates to a Server 2000 environment. I am not able to find any
> information on what should be done in a Server 2003 environment. I am
> courious abour what you were able to get working? We have tried to
implement
> the recommendations in the Tech Note; however, when we click the Frontedn
> icon, nothing happens. We are looking for some assistance in
understanding
> how to set-up this environment correctly. Your assistance is greatly
> appreciated.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Robert
| |
| Robert1105 2005-05-05, 8:25 pm |
| Thanks you Van. Do you still require the Transform installed in Win 2003
Terminal Server?
Can you also provide a summary of your configuration so I can understand
what you did that was successful?
Regards,
"Van T. Dinh" wrote:
> We are using an Access 2002 on Win 2003 Terminal Server with a number of
> users still on Citrix MetaFrame on Win 2000 server. The whole system works
> fine except for the mapping of printers by Citrix.
>
> --
> HTH
> Van T. Dinh
> MVP (Access)
>
>
>
> "Robert1105" < Robert1105@discussio
ns.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:06B97D55-C1F2-47E3-93FF- 26FE5293EDAE@microso
ft.com...
> infrastructure.
> needing
> however,
> implement
> understanding
>
>
>
| |
| david epsom dot com dot au 2005-05-05, 8:25 pm |
| http://office.microsoft.com/en-gb/a...1363351033.aspx
" Note With Office XP, you are no longer required to use a special
transform to install Office"
The problem was with the Office 2000 installation package, not
with the server.
There was also, years ago, a version of Windows Server
that had problems with shared applications, but that does
not affect any current patch or version.
(david)
"Robert1105" < Robert1105@discussio
ns.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:52B0E6EF-5C77-4F9C-ACF6- 3501AE8EC45F@microso
ft.com...[color=darkred]
> Thanks you Van. Do you still require the Transform installed in Win 2003
> Terminal Server?
>
> Can you also provide a summary of your configuration so I can understand
> what you did that was successful?
>
> Regards,
>
> "Van T. Dinh" wrote:
>
| |
| Robert1105 2005-05-13, 8:24 pm |
| Thank you for your guidance. This clarified this for me.
"david epsom dot com dot au" wrote:
> http://office.microsoft.com/en-gb/a...1363351033.aspx
> " Note With Office XP, you are no longer required to use a special
> transform to install Office"
>
> The problem was with the Office 2000 installation package, not
> with the server.
>
> There was also, years ago, a version of Windows Server
> that had problems with shared applications, but that does
> not affect any current patch or version.
>
> (david)
>
>
> "Robert1105" < Robert1105@discussio
ns.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:52B0E6EF-5C77-4F9C-ACF6- 3501AE8EC45F@microso
ft.com...
>
>
>
|
|
|
|
|