|
Home > Archive > MS Access Multiuser > September 2005 > UserRoster shows multiple entries
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
UserRoster shows multiple entries
|
|
| anuruddha.j@gmail.com 2005-09-18, 8:24 pm |
| When I use the Jet UserRoster to find out who is currently logged into
my database (using the code from
http://support.microsoft.com/defaul...kb;en-us;198755), I find
multiple entries for each user - sometimes up to 5.
This happens even when I know for certain that no one else is logged
into the database. I expect to see two connections from my computer,
since I have the mdb open once in Access, and the ShowUserRoster sub
creates a new ADO connection, but why am I getting so many entries?
Also, I have a no-permissions account called ListUsers that I use to
get a list of groups in the workgroup file - this also shows up in the
list of logged-in users, although ListUsers does not have Open
permission for the database. Am I missing something very obvious here?
Help would be very much appreciated.
Sample output:
COMPUTER_NAME LOGIN_NAME CONNECTED
SUSPECT_STATE
SHADOWFAX Administrator
True Null
SHADOWFAX Administrator
True Null
SHADOWFAX Administrator
True Null
SHADOWFAX Administrator
True Null
I know this is formatted wrong, but it does give a picture; I seem to
be logged in 4 times, from the same computer. Baffling.
Thanks in advance, anyone who can help me sort this out.
| |
| Dervorin 2005-09-18, 8:24 pm |
| Sorry, one thing I forgot to mention: I'm using the Administrator login
for both the mdb as well as the ADO connection - if I change the
username on the ADO connection, I get two entries under Administrator
and two entries under the other username - Adrian in this case:
COMPUTER_NAME LOGIN_NAME CONNECTED
SUSPECT_STATE
SHADOWFAX Administrator
True Null
SHADOWFAX Administrator
True Null
SHADOWFAX Adrian
True Null
SHADOWFAX Adrian
True Null
Still twice as many as there should be, by my thinking.
|
|
|
|
|