|
Home > Archive > FoxPro Help and Support > June 2005 > Has these been already signalled? [set order to TAG]
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Has these been already signalled? [set order to TAG]
|
|
| Villi Bernaroli 2005-06-21, 9:24 am |
| It's about the DESCENDING() status of an order and the SET ORDER
TO TagXX command.
In VFP6, if the table was ordered with the same tag TagXX and the
order was DESCENDING(), issuing "set order to TagXX" left the
table order descending.
In VFP8, even if the table is already ordered on TagXX and it's
descending, issuing "set order to TagXX" makes the table order
lose the descending().
Just noted it today. Anyone else?
--
The answer to the ethernal question is:
put a read events after the launch of the form
| |
| Paul Pedersen 2005-06-21, 8:25 pm |
| I don't remember. But when doing such things in code, I look at DESCENDING()
first, so that I know what the situation is.
You can also SET ORDER TO blahblah ASCENDING.
"Villi Bernaroli" <a@b.c> wrote in message
news:O5Z6lTmdFHA.1448@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> It's about the DESCENDING() status of an order and the SET ORDER TO TagXX
> command.
> In VFP6, if the table was ordered with the same tag TagXX and the order
> was DESCENDING(), issuing "set order to TagXX" left the table order
> descending.
> In VFP8, even if the table is already ordered on TagXX and it's
> descending, issuing "set order to TagXX" makes the table order lose the
> descending().
> Just noted it today. Anyone else?
> --
> The answer to the ethernal question is:
> put a read events after the launch of the form
>
|
|
|
|
|