Drop Table
Support Forum for database administrators and web based access to important newsgroups related to databasesI believe it is currently scheduled for a mid-2006 supported release. In the meantime, you can start MSSQL with trace flag 1400 to enable the non-supported db mirroring. Cheers Rob
Post Follow-up to this messageMirroring IS released. It is in the product and can be used. It is not supported at this point, which is different from being released. You have to turn on trace flag 1400 on all instances participating in mirroring, but it can be done. It will be supported when they are ready to support it, there aren't any dates published. It does work and it will work very reliably and very effectively. I've been testing it since Beta 1 and have deployed it into production at 3 customers already as well as working with several other companies to define their architecture around Mirroring. I have zero qualms with putting it into poduction at this point, even if it isn't supported yet. -- Mike Mentor Solid Quality Learning http://www. solidqualitylearning .com "Joe D" <jkdriscoll@qg.com> wrote in message news:douttr$8ej$1@sx news1.qg.com... > Any word on when DB Mirroring will be released? >
Post Follow-up to this messageMike, Thanks for the reply. I have a follow up question about DB Mirroring. I attended a one day event in Chicago several months back and was impressed with DB Mirroring. What I don't remember though is, how does DB Mirroring differ from Replication? Is there a good source (white paper, blog) that describes the differences, the Pro's & Con's of both? thanks, Joe D "Michael Hotek" < mike@solidqualitylea rning.com> wrote in message news:u44db2NDGHA.516@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl... > Mirroring IS released. It is in the product and can be used. It is not > supported at this point, which is different from being released. You have > to turn on trace flag 1400 on all instances participating in mirroring, > but it can be done. > > It will be supported when they are ready to support it, there aren't any > dates published. It does work and it will work very reliably and very > effectively. I've been testing it since Beta 1 and have deployed it into > production at 3 customers already as well as working with several other > companies to define their architecture around Mirroring. I have zero > qualms with putting it into poduction at this point, even if it isn't > supported yet. > > -- > Mike > Mentor > Solid Quality Learning > http://www. solidqualitylearning .com > > > "Joe D" <jkdriscoll@qg.com> wrote in message > news:douttr$8ej$1@sx news1.qg.com... > >
Post Follow-up to this messageThis is the most comprehensive whitepaper on Database Mirroring that exists. http://www.microsoft.com/technet/pr...5/dbmirror.mspx There isn't an equivalent for replication. The main part is with the integration point within the engine. Mirroring operates at an engine level and writes transactions to the mirror as they occur. Replication happens external to the engine and duplicates transactions after they have already been committed. -- Mike Mentor Solid Quality Learning http://www. solidqualitylearning .com "Joe D" <jkdriscoll@qg.com> wrote in message news:dp3s5r$g02$1@sx news1.qg.com... > Mike, > Thanks for the reply. I have a follow up question about DB Mirroring. I > attended a one day event in Chicago several months back and was impressed > with DB Mirroring. What I don't remember though is, how does DB Mirroring > differ from Replication? Is there a good source (white paper, blog) that > describes the differences, the Pro's & Con's of both? > > thanks, > > Joe D > > > "Michael Hotek" < mike@solidqualitylea rning.com> wrote in message > news:u44db2NDGHA.516@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl... > >
Post Follow-up to this message
Show a Printable Version
Email This Page to Someone!
Receive updates to this thread