Drop Table
Support Forum for database administrators and web based access to important newsgroups related to databasesI've been reading articles and working with the samples and tutorials for a few weeks now on 2005 Notification Services and I'm just not seeing the big gain. Can someone please explain how and why this is a useful tool to implement rather than build by hand? It seems that all the work requires hard coding the data changing events in the procs which do the work. So say I update a ActiveFlag from 0 to 1, and I need to send an email to the user t o say their record has been activated. What about notification services sees that data change and tosses an event? I don't want to use a trigger or code the proc that does the bit change, I want NS to see it and do everything. I'm clearly missing something. As a follow up, the interfaces I build for users to create subscriptions have to be hard coded for each specific type o f notification, because it needs to tie back to each instance of a service. Isn't that a really bad way to program in terms of scalability? I appreciat e the help, thanks for reading.
Post Follow-up to this messageThanks for your question.
You might get a better response on this topic by posting to the
microsoft.public.sqlserver.notificationsvcs group.
--
Cheers,
'(' Jeff A. Stucker
\
Senior Consultant
www.rapidigm.com
"Cameron" <Cameron@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:FD1018AB-B93F-40C8-B9A0- 9B3B0982FA5F@microso
ft.com...
> I've been reading articles and working with the samples and tutorials for
> a
> few weeks now on 2005 Notification Services and I'm just not seeing the
> big
> gain. Can someone please explain how and why this is a useful tool to
> implement rather than build by hand? It seems that all the work requires
> hard coding the data changing events in the procs which do the work. So
> say
> I update a ActiveFlag from 0 to 1, and I need to send an email to the user
> to
> say their record has been activated. What about notification services
> sees
> that data change and tosses an event? I don't want to use a trigger or
> code
> the proc that does the bit change, I want NS to see it and do everything.
> I'm clearly missing something. As a follow up, the interfaces I build for
> users to create subscriptions have to be hard coded for each specific type
> of
> notification, because it needs to tie back to each instance of a service.
> Isn't that a really bad way to program in terms of scalability? I
> appreciate
> the help, thanks for reading.
Post Follow-up to this message
Show a Printable Version
Email This Page to Someone!
Receive updates to this thread