Drop Table

Support Forum for database administrators and web based access to important newsgroups related to databases
Register on Database Support Forum Edit your profileCalendarFind other Database Support forum membersFrequently Asked QuestionsSearch this forum -> 
For Database admins: Free Database-related Magazines Now Free shipping to Texas


Post New Thread










Thread
Author

Slowness of SQL2k5 in comparison with SQL2k
I have database. The database is pure OLTP database. Performnace is very
important for the database. 90% of all db calls is call of 4 stored
procedures. I created test script which do such calls. I do performance test
s
both in SQL2k and in SQL2k5. Databases have exactly same data. I did update
statistics and rebuild of indices in SQL2k5 after resore from SQL2k backup.
I encountered strange problem - in SQL2k5 test script works ~30% more slowly
.
Exactly same execution plans, no difference. Test computer - 2 x Xeon 3.6
GHz, EMC CX500 direct attached. After looking at counters, I found only one
possible reason of slowness - SQL2k5 for the SPs write ~30% more data to
transaction log. Why it is so, what can be done to have at least same
performance as is in SQL2k?

Report this thread to moderator Post Follow-up to this message
Old Post
andsm
01-31-06 01:23 AM


Re: Slowness of SQL2k5 in comparison with SQL2k
Can you help us a bit by posting code and database structure?

--
Mike
http://www. solidqualitylearning
.com
Disclaimer: This communication is an original work and represents my sole
views on the subject.  It does not represent the views of any other person
or entity either by inference or direct reference.


"andsm" <andsm@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:F4DA20A9-DF3E-4780-8D68- 2032CA789967@microso
ft.com...
>I have database. The database is pure OLTP database. Performnace is very
> important for the database. 90% of all db calls is call of 4 stored
> procedures. I created test script which do such calls. I do performance
> tests
> both in SQL2k and in SQL2k5. Databases have exactly same data. I did
> update
> statistics and rebuild of indices in SQL2k5 after resore from SQL2k
> backup.
> I encountered strange problem - in SQL2k5 test script works ~30% more
> slowly.
> Exactly same execution plans, no difference. Test computer - 2 x Xeon 3.6
> GHz, EMC CX500 direct attached. After looking at counters, I found only
> one
> possible reason of slowness - SQL2k5 for the SPs write ~30% more data to
> transaction log. Why it is so, what can be done to have at least same
> performance as is in SQL2k?



Report this thread to moderator Post Follow-up to this message
Old Post
Michael Hotek
01-31-06 08:23 AM


Sponsored Links





Last Thread Next Thread
Post New Thread

MS SQL Server archive

Show a Printable Version Email This Page to Someone! Receive updates to this thread
Microsoft SQL Server
Access database support
PostgreSQL Replication
SQL Server ODBC
FoxPro Support
PostgreSQL pgAdmin
SQL Server Clustering
MySQL ODBC
Web Applications with dBASE
SQL Server CE
MySQL++
Sybase Database Support
MS SQL Full Text Search
PostgreSQL Administration
SQL Anywhere support
DB2 UDB Database
Paradox Database Support
Filemaker Database
Berkley DB
SQL 2000/2000i database
ASE Database
Forum Jump:
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:13 AM.

 
Mobile devices forum | Database support forum archive




Copyrights DropTable.com Database Support Forum 2004 - 2006