Drop Table
Support Forum for database administrators and web based access to important newsgroups related to databasesI have database. The database is pure OLTP database. Performnace is very important for the database. 90% of all db calls is call of 4 stored procedures. I created test script which do such calls. I do performance test s both in SQL2k and in SQL2k5. Databases have exactly same data. I did update statistics and rebuild of indices in SQL2k5 after resore from SQL2k backup. I encountered strange problem - in SQL2k5 test script works ~30% more slowly . Exactly same execution plans, no difference. Test computer - 2 x Xeon 3.6 GHz, EMC CX500 direct attached. After looking at counters, I found only one possible reason of slowness - SQL2k5 for the SPs write ~30% more data to transaction log. Why it is so, what can be done to have at least same performance as is in SQL2k?
Post Follow-up to this messageCan you help us a bit by posting code and database structure? -- Mike http://www. solidqualitylearning .com Disclaimer: This communication is an original work and represents my sole views on the subject. It does not represent the views of any other person or entity either by inference or direct reference. "andsm" <andsm@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:F4DA20A9-DF3E-4780-8D68- 2032CA789967@microso ft.com... >I have database. The database is pure OLTP database. Performnace is very > important for the database. 90% of all db calls is call of 4 stored > procedures. I created test script which do such calls. I do performance > tests > both in SQL2k and in SQL2k5. Databases have exactly same data. I did > update > statistics and rebuild of indices in SQL2k5 after resore from SQL2k > backup. > I encountered strange problem - in SQL2k5 test script works ~30% more > slowly. > Exactly same execution plans, no difference. Test computer - 2 x Xeon 3.6 > GHz, EMC CX500 direct attached. After looking at counters, I found only > one > possible reason of slowness - SQL2k5 for the SPs write ~30% more data to > transaction log. Why it is so, what can be done to have at least same > performance as is in SQL2k?
Post Follow-up to this message
Show a Printable Version
Email This Page to Someone!
Receive updates to this thread