Drop Table

Support Forum for database administrators and web based access to important newsgroups related to databases
Register on Database Support Forum Edit your profileCalendarFind other Database Support forum membersFrequently Asked QuestionsSearch this forum -> 
For Database admins: Free Database-related Magazines Now Free shipping to Texas


Post New Thread










Thread
Author

SET ANSI_WARNINGS in Stored Procs - how to avoid recompilation bottleneck?
Ok, here's my dilemma.  We're running SQL Server 2000 with the default
db setting for the ANSI_WARNINGS option set to off.  However, we still
get "Warning: Null value is eliminated by an aggregate or other SET
operation" messages.  To eliminate getting the message, we use the SET
ANSI_WARNINGS OFF in our stored procs.  Using that SET command forces a
recompilation of the SP and is causing locks/blocking.  Anybody else
run into this problem and if so, how have you handled it.

Thanks,
-Nate


Report this thread to moderator Post Follow-up to this message
Old Post
nate.hughes@usa.net
08-31-05 02:28 PM


Sponsored Links





Last Thread Next Thread
Post New Thread

Microsoft SQL Server forum archive

Show a Printable Version Email This Page to Someone! Receive updates to this thread
Microsoft SQL Server
Access database support
PostgreSQL Replication
SQL Server ODBC
FoxPro Support
PostgreSQL pgAdmin
SQL Server Clustering
MySQL ODBC
Web Applications with dBASE
SQL Server CE
MySQL++
Sybase Database Support
MS SQL Full Text Search
PostgreSQL Administration
SQL Anywhere support
DB2 UDB Database
Paradox Database Support
Filemaker Database
Berkley DB
SQL 2000/2000i database
ASE Database
Forum Jump:
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:10 PM.

 
Mobile devices forum | Database support forum archive




Copyrights DropTable.com Database Support Forum 2004 - 2006