Drop Table
Support Forum for database administrators and web based access to important newsgroups related to databasesHello sir We have a very huge database its around 6 lakh records are being stored in it. records are not being a sorted order so we checked all record field through clustering option in Sql server.when we used clustering records are showing in sorted order but speed of database is very slow . i want to know with clustering is there any implecation in database regading performance od data.Can any one give his views to solve this problem?and increase the performance of our database. thanks a lot
Post Follow-up to this messageI dont understand. Do you mean to say that you put clustered indeks on a number of columns in the table to make it ordered? Thats a mistake, you must use order by clause in a query to ensure that it is ordered. Furthemore, indeksing a large table is not something you should do lightly, clustered indeks is (if it can be) in memory and its key is in the nonclustered indexes so if the key of the clustered indeks is large, your performance will suffer. Not to mention the data changes (insert, update..) Please post more info about your situation so we can help some more. MC "vibha vyas" <vyas.vibha@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1132297991.742116.21620@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > Hello sir > We have a very huge database its around 6 lakh records > are being stored in it. > records are not being a sorted order so we checked all > record field through clustering option in Sql server.when we used > clustering records are showing in sorted order but speed of database is > very slow . > i want to know with clustering is there any implecation in database > regading performance od data.Can any one give his views to solve this > problem?and increase the performance of our database. > thanks a lot >
Post Follow-up to this message[posted and mailed, please reply in news] vibha vyas (vyas.vibha@gmail.com) writes: > We have a very huge database its around 6 lakh records > are being stored in it. > records are not being a sorted order so we checked all > record field through clustering option in Sql server.when we used > clustering records are showing in sorted order but speed of database is > very slow . If records are not displayed in the order you want, you need to use an ORDER BY clause in your queries. That's the only way. > i want to know with clustering is there any implecation in database > regading performance od data.Can any one give his views to solve this > problem?and increase the performance of our database. It's usually considered best practice to have a clustered index on a table. What you should put clustered index on is a more delicate matter. For INSERT-itensive tables, the clusrered index may be chosen to keep fragmentation in check. But normally, the clustered index is picked to accomdate a common queries. An Orders table for instance is likely to have its clustered index on OrderDate or CustomerID. Generally, the clustered index should not be too long as it also appears as row locator in non-clustered indexes. -- Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, esquel@sommarskog.se Books Online for SQL Server 2005 at http://www.microsoft.com/technet/pr...oads/books.mspx Books Online for SQL Server 2000 at http://www.microsoft.com/sql/prodin...ions/books.mspx
Post Follow-up to this message
Show a Printable Version
Email This Page to Someone!
Receive updates to this thread